Cognitive Psychology and its modern influence

Cognitive Psychology and its modern influence. Cognitive psychology looks at the mental process and its relation to expression of behavior. The article most teachers believe that kids have different ‘learning styles’ here is why they are wrong gives comprehensive information on what influences children to understand what they are learning. Additionally, it is an issue from the Washington Post newspaper which shows the information given is credible and is addressed to the public to educate them on the sensitive matter of children education.

The article mainly used ethos mode of persuasion to relay information. For instance, most claims are in reference to cognitive scientists or reliable experts who have done a comprehensive study on the subject. The author of the article derives most of the writing from a direct quotation from two experts whose work have contributed to the cognitive psychology study.

There has always been a flaw in the way most people interpret the concept of learning styles. For instance, some parents think that their children learn better visually while others grasp information better by listening. However, the article states that experts have proved there is no consensus on the aspect of “learning styles” and more importantly they do not exist (Strauss, 2017). Furthermore, people mistake human intelligence with learning styles.

Cognitive Psychology

In the light of ethos mode of persuasion, the article features the finding of a cognitive scientist, Daniel Willingham, whose study in the University of Virginia entailed research on the brain. Additionally, Daniel Willingham studied cognitive psychology for fifteen years and was elected by President Barak Obama as head of National Board of Education. In his statement, Willingham states that most teachers rely on the accuracy of learning style theory and concludes that the styles are mare myths which have been influencing most Americans.

Apart from the learning style myth, the article also addresses other common misinterpretations made by educators and the public. For instance, people believe that children become less attentive when consuming sugar, we only use approximately 10% of our brains, some people use their left brain while others use their right brain which explains differences in learning, and individuals are more effective when learning if appropriate learning style is used. Unfortunately, academic journals also take part in delivering this information which explains why most people believe in it (Strauss, 2017).

Additionally, the article states that the concept of learning theory makes sense and is appealing which is why people believe in it so easily. The reason why learning style concept is wrong is that human beings are able to make a distinction between types of tasks since they are separable in the brain (Strauss, 2017). Moreover, tasks that can be handled in more than one way tend to be easier when done in a particular way or another.

For instance, when children are asked to recall nouns stated to them one at a time, they can choose to complete the task by creating a visual mental image or by repeating the word to themselves. The article concludes by stating that learning style does not account for anything while enhancing a performance. Notably, while most teachers say they learned the theories while attaining their education none of the books thought to teachers support the concept.

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99