Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour essay

The Story of an Hour essay.
The Story of an Hour: Discuss three examples AND kinds irony used in “The Story of an Hour. ” Make sure to have one example of verbal irony, one of situational irony, and one of dramatic irony. One example of verbal irony in “A Story of an Hour” is the last sentence in the story which says “When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease—of joy that kills” (DiYanni 41) This is verbal irony because it is written that she died of too much happiness to see her husband, whom she thought was dead, alive.
However, it was because she was incredibly distressed to see him. One instance of situational irony in “The Story of an Hour” is when Mrs. Mallard learns of the death of her husband. At first, she reacts as any person would at the news of losing someone close to them by crying and isolating herself. However her real feelings about her husband’s death are shown later when she thought to herself, “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself” (40) However this feeling of freedom did not last long.
Towards the end of the story her husband appears at the door unharmed. She then realized that she was not free from her unhappy marriage at all. Dramatic irony is also used in “The Story of an Hour” through Mrs. Mallard’s realization that she is free from her husband and with her death. While Mrs. Mallard was alone in her room she realized that she would no longer be bound to her husband but rather free to do whatever she should choose.

However, no one else in the story knew this; they all believed that she was very sad and depressed. Josephine, a woman in the house, even thought Mrs. Mallard was making herself sick. She said, “I beg; open the door—you will make yourself ill” (40) However, Mrs. Mallard was doing quite the opposite by “drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window” (40).

The Story of an Hour essay

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour Analysis

The Story of an Hour Analysis.
After discovering the death of her husband Brently, Louise Mallard is filled with grief and sorrow. Louise out of instinct, stumbles upstairs to her bedroom and sits down to be alone and cry. However what soon awaits her is an open window. Louise peers out of the window and feels the cool blowing wind, fresh air, the foreseeing scents, and the calming sounds. From the open window itself, Louise experiences a sense of freedom and immediately stops her sobbing.

Kate Chopin herself even says: “She was drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window.” (Chopin #222). Kate Chopin represents the window as a picture of freedom and opportunity that she could experience after her husband’s death. Louise ponders a new life from merely looking out of the window and at the same time feels a sense of elation from looking at the sky. Louise then mutters “Free! Free! Free!” (Chopin #222).

Through the open window Louise could see a clear, bright view into the distance as well as Louise’s own bright future. Unfortunately, these happy emotions and feelings do not fulfill her expectations- as it was happiness that ended her life. In a sense, Louise could even be happy, because she thought she was a burden to her husband, thus feeling relieved that she did not cause him any more burden. Mrs. Mallard also felt happy in the fact that she may have loved him, but the excitement for the future was too overwhelming, leading her to gleam in happiness just after losing her husband (which is not a normal thing to do).
Moreover, Louise felt she was always being held back and never truly felt that she was allowed to become independent and free. In context, Mrs. Mallard had a special kind of hatred towards her husband. Not a real hatred, but a hatred towards how Brently treated her; In a way which she never felt completely free. Louise’s heart troubles reflect a lot on her freedom as well.
The heart troubles that impact Louise both physically and emotionally represent the confusion towards her marriage as well as the unhappiness she had for the lack of freedom. The fact that Louise has a weak heart made it difficult and threatening for her sister, Josephine, to convey the message of her husband’s death to her. A person with a weak heart afterall, would not deal well with such sudden heart-breaking news. In the end however, excitement was the factor that ended her life.
Not because of her sadness and shock of her husband’s death, but rather the excitement of independence and freedom which stirred her heart tremendously. Louise herself even whispered,“Free! Body and Soul free!” (Chopin #222) The story of an Hour could very well be considered as an ironic story.  Mrs. Mallard is portrayed as a wife that loves her husband, but at the same time happy by his sudden disappearance.
In the beginning of the story, Mrs. Mallard’s hope for her “future” life was completely ironic too, because it was when she died that Kate Chopin described Louise’s death of “a joy that kills” (Chopin #223). But we, as a reader, know that it was obviously not the joy that killed her- it was the excitement for the future that awaited her.
All of that however stopped her heart when she discovers that her husband is still alive. What Louise Mallard wanted the most was freedom, and when she saw that small glimpse of freedom through the open window, she could not go back to living under her husband’s control. Ultimately in the end dying in a state of complete shock and misery.
Work Cited

Chopin, Kate. “The Story of an Hour.” Reading and Writing from Literature. John E. Schwiebert. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2005. 221-223. Print.

The Story of an Hour Analysis

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

Clever Manka and the Story of An Hour

Clever Manka and the Story of An Hour.
Manka and Louise Both short stories are a patriarchal society that restricted the roles of women, especially in their marriage. The setting in Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” takes place in a small city in the early 1900s. This story has actual characters with names, such as Louise Mallard. The main character is Louise Mallard, she is a women looking to get freedom from her husband, and she gets that chance when he dies in a railroad accident. The setting in “Clever Manka” takes place in a rural farming community is Czechoslovakia.
This story has stereotypical characters, such as the Burgomaster, the farmer, and the shepherd. The main character in is Manka; she is a woman that is a very quick thinker. She shows the burgomaster how clever she is by knowing all the answers to his riddles. In “Clever Manka” and Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”, both demonstrate differences in health, personalities, and relationships. One difference between Manka and Louise is their health. Manka is a young woman who is in good health. She has no health problems, but on the other hand Louise does.
In the beginning of “The Story of an Hour”, it’s stated that “Louise had heart trouble” (Chopin 666). Knowing that Louise had heart trouble, her sister carefully told her about her husband’s death, to try to refrain from Louise having a heart attack. Another difference between Manka and Louise is their personalities. Manka is an independent woman. She has a very intelligent and confident personality. To show how clever she really was, the Burgomaster gave a riddle to her father (the shepherd) to give to Manka.

It was “tell her to come see me, but she must come neither by day nor by night, neither riding nor walking, neither dressed nor undressed” (Manka, 18). Her father told her what the burgomaster said. She showed how smart she was by going to his house at dawn (Neither by day nor by night), wearing fish net (neither dressed not undressed), with one leg over a goat and one foot on the ground (neither riding nor walking). The Burgomaster was so surprised by her cleverness that he had to marry her. He then told her “you are not to use that cleverness of yours at my expense. I won’t have you interfering in any of my cases.
In fact, if ever you give advice to anyone who comes to my for judgment, I’ll turn you out of my house at once and send you home to your father” (Manka, 19). Even the burgomaster was intimidated by Manka’s intelligence. Even though Louise did not seem as intelligent as Manka, she still had a thinking personality. After Louise’s Sister Josephine told her about her husband’s death, she went up to her room (where most of the story took place) and she began to think. She then realized she was free from her husband, and she was now happy that she was not under his ruling anymore.
She said “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself” (Chopin 667). Another difference between Manka and Louise is their relationships with their husbands. They are both married this is one similarity that they share. Manka and the Burgomaster seem to get along well, except when she got into one of his cases. He told her if she interfered with any of his business he would send her back to her father’s house and he was going to do just that. He told Manka she could take one thing with her.
She asked if she could stay till after supper, he agreed. She ended up getting him drunk and taking him to his father’s house. He woke up and asked her “what does this mean? ” She replied “You know you told me I might take with me the one thing I liked best in your house, so of course I took you” (Manka, 20). He then told her that she was to clever for him, and then they went back home. After that their relationship got stronger, and if a case was too difficult for him they went to her for advice. On the other hand Louise and her husband didn’t have such a good relationship.
In the story, not much is said about Mr. Mallard and her relationship. Going off how she reacted when her sister told her he had died in a railroad accident, their relationship was sketchy. She loved him—sometimes, but often she didn’t. In the story, she said “Free! Body and soul free” (Chopin, 668). Her sister came up to her room to see if she was okay. Bringing Louise downstairs, they saw at the base of the stairwell, Mr. Mallard as he came through the door. As soon as she saw him Louise died. When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease– of joy that ills. In both short stories, “Clever Manka” and “The Story of an Hour”, we read about two very different women, and compared and contrasted their health, personalities, and relationships with their husband’s. Although they did had some things in common, one was they both lived in a dominant male society. Chopin, Kate. “Story of an Hour. ” Successful College Writing. Ed. Kathleen McWhorter. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2009. 665-668 “Clever Manka. ” Introduction to Literature. Eds. Alice S. Landy And William Rodney Allen. 6th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,

Clever Manka and the Story of An Hour

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour Reflection

The Story of an Hour Reflection.
A Reflection on “The Story of an Hour” Rose Rankin Shashonda Porter ENG 125 December 12th, 2011 A Reflection on “The Story of an Hour” Summary The short story “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin was written in 1894. In the beginning of the story, we discover that Mrs. Louise Mallard has a heart condition, but she is also said to be young. Which to me seemed odd, but I overlooked this detail so that I could continue the story. Mrs. Mallard’s sister Josephine and Mrs. Mallard’s husband friend Richard came to her house to break the news of the death of her husband in a railroad disaster.
They tried to tell her the news gently, because of her condition. To them she seemed to react how a new widow should. She wept and collapsed in her sisters’ arms, before running to her room to be alone. This is where the story soon takes a turn. There in her room, she was actually crying because of happiness of the death rather than sadness. Her sister thinks Mrs. Mallard is making herself sick. In the final paragraphs, Mrs. Mallard leaves her bedroom, when her husband walks into the front door, Mrs. Mallard than passes away at the sight of her husband. Structure/ Key Terms The Story of an Hour” was told in the 3rd person point of view, which enables the readers to have a better view and understanding of the story. I noticed Kate Chopin used quite a bit of symbolism in the story as well. For instance, Mrs. Mallard welcomes the new spring life through the window of her room. This symbolizes a new beginning of her new life without her husband. The tone is ironically relief and joy, despite the news of death. One would think that sadness and instability would be the tone. However, Chopin uses specific language and details to portray otherwise.
My thoughts of the story “…the present story is not only brief and clear but also compelling and complex, and it easily lends itself to a variety of critical approaches” (R. C. Evans, 2001). This story was very captivating. I was able to use my imagination to see the characters in full form. Kate Chopin, author of the story went into great detail to portray the setting in the story as well as the tone. At first glance, I thought the tone set for this story was sad and depressing. But I soon realized it was more of relief and happiness.

I couldn’t help but to be swept away to this time period and feel as if I were witnessing the situation first hand. At first I couldn’t help but to feel a sense of sadness for Louise Mallard. I mean she had just lost her husband. But I soon realized when she fled to her room, that I felt relieved with her. I felt the empowerment with Louise Mallard. Kate Chopin goes into great detail describing the feeling and emotions that come over Mrs. Mallard after she escapes to her room. Chopin describes the scenery outside of Mrs. Mallard’s window to be spring in full bloom. These details provide a look at Mrs.
Mallard’s new life without her husband. She was relieved that he had passed away. She was “free, free, free! ” (Clugston, 2010, Chopin, 1894). Later, Chopin goes into more detail on how Mrs. Mallard is feeling, in the following paragraphs. “But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome. …. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow–creature.
A kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination. …”Free! Body and soul free! ” she kept whispering” (Clugston, 2010, Chopin, 1894). As Mrs. Mallard returns downstairs her husband enters the room, Mrs. Mallard quickly passes away. I can’t help to question the reasoning behind her death. Was it the surprise of her husband’s return that made her heart to stop beating? Or was it more on the lines of she won’t receive this new bound freedom she was dreaming of that caused her heart to fail?
I can’t help but to think it was her freedom suddenly disappearing that ended her life at a young age. I recently read a chapter from a source provided. It lists students’ perspective on certain points in the story. Students were asked to analyze the following statement as a reader-response critic “She said it over and over under her breath: free! Free! Free! ” (Clugston, 2010, Chopin, 1894). Barbara Larson (a student from Auburn University) states breaks down each piece of the statement.
She says “The words ‘under her breath’ might also encourage the reader to feel an intimacy with Louise and thus regard her sympathetically, since the reader is allowed to share a very personal moment. Likewise, by placing exclamation marks after each use of ‘free,’ Chopin may be encouraging the reader to chare Louise’s excitement about this new-found liberty (B. Larson, R. C. Evans, 2001). Larson’s statement describes my feeling towards this statement exactly. After reading the statement I felt a connection with Mrs. Mallard in a sense of I have experienced the feeling of freedom.
Not that a past love passed away, more like a past love finally released me from the grasp I felt around my neck when I was with him. I felt a connection with Mrs. Mallard at that very point in the story. References * R. W. Clugston (2010) Journey to Literature Retrieved from: https://content. ashford. edu/books/AUENG125. 10. 2 * R. C. Evans (2001) Close Readings: Analysis of Short Fiction from Multiple Perspectives by Students of Auburn University Montgomery Retrieved from: http://site. ebrary. com/lib/ashford/docDetail. action? docID=10015376&p00=kate%20chopin

The Story of an Hour Reflection

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin

The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin.
The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin is an impressive literary piece that touches the reader’s feelings as well as the mind. Even thought that the story is short, it is very rich, complete, and it carries deep sense of meaning to everyone. It is also represented through a negative view of marriage with a woman that is not saddened by the death of her husband. It is a great view to read it carefully and pay attention to each and every word said in this story they are telling. This short story is trying to bring the meaning is not to believe everything that is told to you until it is seen with your own two eyes.
This short story was very interesting to because it captured how the main character experienced in her life regarding something that not everyone has the luck to have the happiness of freedom, but it will only be understood at the end of the story. In the story Mrs. Mallard has heart trouble and her friends come over to break the news about her husband’s death most gentle as possible. Most of the time with a story like that as the reader reads expects to be feeling sad and for a while they thought Mrs. Mallard wouldn’t be able to control herself from the pain of having her husband pass away. She understands the news and understands the news when the author shows it little by little on how she realizes it and what helps her to understand it. In one of the paragraphs it says “She goes to the room and there stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair into this she sank” (Chopin, 1851-1904). This is a symbol of security and comfort even though her husband died, the open window meaning the connection to another world. Mrs.
Mallard ends up dying of joy that kills because she got to see her husband walk in after being told that he was killed. She dies from happiness of seeing her husband again and chooses rather to die than to live again under her husband’s will after experiencing freedom. Irony as the ability to alter other’s ideas about what might be expected and what things can really occur. Mrs. Mallard was very devastated and unable to think straight after hearing the news of the accident that had occurred with her husband. The only thing was she saw him alive and doing well.

She prepared herself for her husband’s death and grieving time, so that she can see him walking in the door. In this story formalist approach is used in this literary criticism on how it was developed. In our textbooks it states that “Every writer chooses particular tools to create a presentation of something that exists in his or her imagination (Clugston, 2010). The setting of this story that makes it so memorable is that Mrs. Mallard is in her bedroom most of the time throughout this story getting ready for her to hear the bad news about her husband.
There was a great surprise at the end of the story and it was that she was so shocked to know that her husband was alive and that nothing really happened to him. Mrs. Mallard with her heart condition and all was the one that got killed after a joy of killing. She thought she would have freedom even if it was just for one hour. After this hour passed it made her feel comfortable, happy, and free to make her understand a sense of her being. The story of an hour was long lived even if Mrs. Mallard only got to live an hour of her being free without her husband before she found out that he was alive.
We should only believe what we see with our own two eyes before we start thinking that everything has happened. The bad news that Mrs. Mallard received was from other people that came to tell her about the accident, but really it wasn’t true because her husband appeared right through the front door. It really didn’t let her live that long after she was shocked with her husband being alive. She ends up feeling a sense of freedom, but it is a freedom that she is the one that ends up departing from this world.

The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour Argumentative Essay

The Story of an Hour Argumentative Essay.
The possibilities of freedom for women were unlikely for women living in the late nineteenth century. Women were confined and overpowered by men. Kate Chopin, a women of the late nineteenth century herself, was a writer living within such a society. In “The Story of an Hour” (1894), Kate Chopin uses elements of settings–windows and door–in order to highlight the possibilities of freedom and the threat of confinement for women in late nineteenth century American society.
Chopin uses figurative language of symbols and imagery to conflate the possibility of freedom with the physical setting outside the window. Chopin uses the “open” window as a symbol to suggest freedom: She juxtaposes the comfortable, roomy armchair with the window to demonstrate Mrs. Mallard’s feelings of freedom and comfortability within her own home now that her husband is dead. Mrs. Mallard looks out of her window into the endless opportunities she is now able to dream of:”There stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair”(Chopin 147).
She uses the “tops of the trees” as symbolic imagery to describe how Mrs. Mallard is now feeling free. The spatial relation between Mrs. Mallard and the trees outside is used to suggest that freedom has become more tangible than before: “She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life” (Chopin 147). Chopin uses taste imagery to suggest that Mrs. Mallard has become more aware of her own senses and perception of freedom:”The delicious breath of rain was in the air”(147).

Chopin conflates the patches of blue sky–a symbol of hope–to emphasize the unbounded prospects Mrs. Mallard now has facing her. Color imagery is used to suggest positive emotion: “There were patches of blue sky showing here and there through the clouds that had met and piled one above the other in the west facing her window” (Chopin 148). Chopin uses onomatopoeia–twittering sparrows–to evoke new life. The spatial relation between Mrs. Mallard and the eaves suggests she is closer to freedom and the outside world.
“Countless sparrows were twittering in the eaves” (Chopin 148). The conflation of symbols and imagery with the possibility of freedom suggests Mrs. Mallard is beginning to feel independent as a women in the late nineteenth century. The possibilities of freedom are becoming more of a reality for Mrs. Mallard. Chopin conflates the spatial relation between Mrs. Mallard and the outside world with sensory imagery to make the possibilities of freedom concrete.
Chopin conflates the spatial imagery –“something coming at her”– between Mrs. Mallard and the unknown to suggest that freedom is something new to her: “There was something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully”(148). Chopin uses animal imagery–“creeping”– to suggest that freedom, once distant, has now become concrete and close. Sense imagery is used to portray new life: “She felt it, creeping out of the sky, reaching toward her through the sounds, the scents, the color that filled the air” (Chopin 148).
Chopin uses the color of Mrs. Mallards white hands as imagery to conflate and compare with heaven; the unknown. “She was striving to beat it back with her will–as powerless as her two white slender hands would have been”(148). The reality that Mrs. Mallard is beginning to feel freedom is something she would have never of dreamed for herself as a women living in her time.
Chopin begins to manipulate the temporal setting by conflating the past and the present. Chopin is able to manipulate the temporal setting, symbolically, by foreshadowing the future. She conflates the present, new life and freedom, with the future, death: “She knew that she would weep again when she saw the, kind tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead”(Chopin 148). Again, Chopin manipulates the temporal setting by conflating the present, a bitter moment, with Mrs. Mallard’s future freedom: “But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely”(148).
Chopin juxtaposes the “open window” with magical medicine, an “elixir” to portray the remedial feeling of freedom Mrs. Mallard is experiencing:”She was drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window” (Chopin 149). Chopin manipulates the temporal setting of the present to suggest a positive future for Mrs. Mallard: “Spring days, and summer days, and all sorts of days that would be her own” (Chopin 149). Chopin conflates Mrs. Mallard’s past feelings of infinite confinement, with her present feelings of everlasting freedom suggesting there may be a long lived future for Mrs. Mallard. “She breathed a quick prayer that life might be long. It was only yesterday she had thought with a shudder that life might be long”(148). The manipulation of time allows Chopin to takes us into the future where endless possibilities await.
Chopin conflates the physical setting–doors–with the possibility of freedom and confinement. Chopin uses the locked door as a metaphor to show that Mrs. Mallard is now in control, something that hasn’t happened before: “Josephine was kneeling before the closed door with her lips to the key-hold; imploring admission”(149). Chopin juxtaposes the idea that Mrs. Mallard was confined and ill before she was in control of her own confinement with the idea she is getting better at last with newfound freedom: “Louise, open the door! I beg; open the door–you will make yourself ill”(149).
Chopin conflates Mrs. Mallard standing up with the action of opening her own door to demonstrate how the possibility of freedom has given her a newfound confidence: “She arose at length and opened the door to her sister’s importunities”(149). As the door is opened by a man, Chopin uses the latchkey as a symbol of confinement to suggest that there is still an inequality between men and women:“Some one was opening the front door with a latchkey. It was Brently Mallard who had entered”(149). Chopin has brought the reality of confinement and inequality back to life as Mrs. Mallard dies as a women in the late nineteenth century locked in her house.
In “The Story of an Hour” (1894), Kate Chopin uses elements of settings–windows and door–in order to highlight the possibilities of freedom and the threat of confinement for women in late nineteenth century American society. The possibilities of freedom for women were unlikely for women living in the late nineteenth century as women were confined and overpowered by men.

The Story of an Hour Argumentative Essay

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

Analysis of The Story of an Hour

Analysis of The Story of an Hour.
In 1894, Kate Chopin wrote, The Story of an Hour. In this fictional tale the author describes the experience of Louise Mallard, a woman with heart trouble, immediately after receiving news of her husbands death. Unlike the expected reaction, Louise actually has a moment of relief realizing the freedoms she now has, which were taken from her by an unhappy marriage.
All the events of the story take place within an hour in Louises home. In the final minutes of the hour, Mrs. Mallard is shocked to see that her husband walks through the front door alive and well, which causes her to have a heart attack and die. While her family believes she had a heart attack because she was overjoyed, the author leads us to conclude the heart attack was actually caused by her realization that the freedoms she looked forward too were no longer a reality. Kate Chopins description of what the main character feels and sees shows us how this is possible.
The story is very well written as it flows from one paragraph to another each presenting a new idea or information for the reader. The story begins by informing us that Louises husband, Brently Mallard, was killed in a railroad disaster. Being that Louise has a heart condition, her family was concerned with how she would react to the bad news. Her sister, Josephine, broke the news to her.

She immediately cried as expected but the interesting part of the story is when she goes into her room and locks the door. While Mrs. Mallard is slouched in a chair her experience doesnt feel that tragic at all. The mood is rather peaceful and relaxing. The reader is reminded more of a sunny day than a gloomy sky. At this point it is almost confusing but Kate Chopin quickly explains the scenario. She explains of a feeling the main character feels approaching. It is then explained that Louise feels free  as a result of her husbands death. We learn that there is no feeling of guilt whatsoever in this moment.
As we stroll through the short paragraphs we see how this feeling of joy becomes greater as she expresses it more through her body, mind, and her words. Her pulse was beating faster and this actually relaxed her. She envisioned what her life was going to be like in the future now that she was on her own and all the visions were of happiness and freedom. She whispered words to herself about her freedom in order to embrace the reality through the sounds of her own voice.
Though she came across a couple of moments that suggested she loved her husband dearly and he was a kind man, her feeling of joy obviously overpowered her memories of having loved her husband. She completely recognized the strong possibilities of crying over her husbands death in the future, yet nothing could ruin the beautiful future she felt was in store for her.
During Louises experience in her room, Josephine was kneeling on the other side of the door begging for Louise to unlock and open it. Josephine was concerned that her sister was stressing herself and it would have negative effects due to her heart problem. Eventually Louise does open the door and walks out with her sister towards the stairs.
To everybodys surprise, Brently Mallard walks in the house through the front door. During this moment Josephine yells out while Richard, who is Brentlys brother, rushed to cover him from his wifes view in order to keep her from having a heart attack from the shock of seeing her husband was alive. Richard did not achieve this as Louise Mallard had died of a heart attack due to her heart disease.
There may be several explanations given as to why Mrs. Mallard reaction caused her death. What was the real reason she had a heart attack? The obvious and probably the easiest answer is simply that she was shocked as if she had seen a ghost. We can go a simple step beyond that and say that a wife who realizes her husband is alive after the thought of his death is filled with such a joy that a troubled heart could not handle. Both of these reasons are very possible, yet the details of this hour suggest there is a different reason for Louises heart attack.
The narrative reveals in several ways that her husbands death was a positive turn in her life that she was actually excited about. Once she saw her husband alive, it destroyed her future of freedom and happiness she had looked so forward to, which her heart could not handle.
The scene in her bedroom provides us with proof of the mood Louise was in immediately after the news of her husbands death. The following, which is excerpted from the story, clearly paints a peaceful picture as Mrs. Mallard looks out of her window:
She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life. The delicious breath of rain was in the air. The notes of a distant song which someone was singing reached her faintly, and countless sparrows were twittering in the eaves. 
This immediately suggests Louise was not feeling rage of any sort. The author proceeds to tell us about a specific feeling that comes over Mrs. Mallard. She whispered the words under her breath, Free, free, free!  She began to welcome this feeling and thought about the unfairness of marriage, which suggests to us that she was very unhappy in her marriage, which results in her feeling of freedom from not belonging to a marriage anymore.
The author uses one sentence in particular which shows us that Louises love for her husband paled in comparison to the joy of her newfound freedom: What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!  This is eventually followed by a description of Louise by the author as she opened the door to her sister on the other side: There was a feverish triumph in her eyes, and she carried herself unwittingly like a goddess of Victory. 
It is very clear that Mrs. Mallard felt as if the struggles of her life were over. She had won. Compare this to an inmate serving life in prison who is told he will be released, not having to finish his sentence. An hour later the prisoner is put in handcuffs and taken back to his cell where he is reminded he will be for life. Imagine the mental strain that would cause the prisoner. I believe Mrs. Mallards situation to be very similar.
This is why after careful review of the text I am convinced that Louises reaction to seeing her husband was still alive, was complete disappointment rather than joy. It was all her newfound hopes and dreams of a future of happiness destroyed due to the fact she would still be a wife. Just as Josephine was wrong about what Louise was going through in the bedroom, the doctors were wrong by saying she died of a joy that kills.

Analysis of The Story of an Hour

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Categories
The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour

The Story of an Hour.
“When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease—of joy that kills. ” MLA Formatted Essay Writing/ TIIC Writing Assignment: Submit a fully developed 3 paragraph essay to turnitin. com in response to the following question: Early in the story we learn that Mrs. Mallard is “afflicted with heart trouble,” though her unexpected reaction to her husband’s death may suggest an alternative reason for her poor health. What was the cause of Mrs. Mallard’s Death? Explain your point of view/argument citing the short story for support.
Assignment Criteria: • 3 paragraphs/ MLA Format (could be longer if necessary) • Paragraph 1 (Introduction) includes: -hook -thesis statement identifying the reason you believe Mrs. Mallard died -explanation of thesis -concluding sentence • Paragraph 2 (large body) includes: -Topic sentence -quote/textual support -commentary -quote/textual support -commentary -quote/textual support -commentary -concluding sentence • Paragraph 3 (conclusion) includes: -Restated thesis -final “call to action” or message you want to leave with reader •
Must provide in text citations as well as a work cited page to accompany your essay. -Text source information to use for your citations: “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin Published by Perfection Learning, 2001 You may find it useful to consider the following questions: ? What do the characters in the story believe caused Mrs. Mallard’s Death? ? What lead them to this conclusion? ? What do you, as the reader know that the other characters do not? ? What does Chopin mean by “the joy that kills? ” How would Mrs. Mallard’s family interpret this quote differently than Mrs. Mallard, herself, would?

The Story of an Hour

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99