BUS591 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS-DISCUSSION 1 WEEK 1

Week 2 – Discussion 1
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

Debits and Credits
Define debits and credits and explain how they are used to record business transactions.  Is it true that debits always increase and credits always decrease? Why or why not?
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

Here is how I will be graded:

Discussion Rubric – 3 points
Discussion Rubric – 3 points
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Content/Subject Knowledge
0.9 ptsDistinguished – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.79 ptsProficient – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.68 ptsBasic – Addresses all aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates basic knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.58 ptsBelow Expectations – Addresses all or most aspects of the prompt in accordance with the parameters of the discussion and demonstrates limited knowledge of the discussion topic.

0.0 ptsNon-Performance – There is no initial discussion post, or the post does not address the discussion prompt at all.

0.9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
0.9 ptsDistinguished – Comprehensively explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates all of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.79 ptsProficient – Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates most of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.68 ptsBasic – Explores the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provides relevant evidence and information that demonstrates some of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and use of information, and logic.

0.58 ptsBelow Expectations – Attempts to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information, but demonstrates few of the following as applicable to the discussion prompt: clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, use of information resources, and logic.

0.0 ptsNon-Performance – There is no attempt to explore the ideas, thoughts, and elements of the topic and provide relevant evidence and information in either the original post or subsequent response posts within the discussion, or no post is present.

0.9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement/ Participation
0.9 ptsDistinguished – Contributes to classroom conversations with at least the minimum number of replies, all of which were thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Fully engages in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

0.79 ptsProficient – Contributes to classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies that are somewhat thoughtful, relevant, and contributed meaningfully to the conversation. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation with appropriate topic-based responses.

0.68 ptsBasic – Contributes to the classroom conversations with the minimum number of replies. Attempts to fully engage in the conversation, but the responses are not relevant or fully aligned with the discussion topic.

0.58 ptsBelow Expectations – Attempts to contribute to the classroom conversations with fewer than the minimum number of replies; however, the replies are not thoughtful and relevant, or they do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

0.0 ptsNon-Performance – There is no contribution to the discussion.

0.9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication
0.3 ptsDistinguished – Displays clear control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

0.26 ptsProficient – Displays control of syntax and mechanics. The organization of the work shows transitions and/or flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains only a few errors and is mostly easy to understand.

0.23 ptsBasic – Displays basic control of syntax and mechanics. The work is not organized with appropriate transitions and flow between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains several errors, making it difficult to fully understand.

0.19 ptsBelow Expectations – Displays limited control of syntax or mechanics. The work does not include any transitions and does not flow easily between sentences and paragraphs. Written work contains major errors.

0.0 ptsNon-Performance – Fails to display control of syntax or mechanics, within the original post and/or responses. Organization is also not present.

0.3 pts

find the cost of your paper

Unit: Hypothesis Testing & Variance

One of the items that businesses would like to be able to test is whether or not a change they make to their procedures is effective. Remember that when you….

Wk 1 Assignment

 Week 1 – Assignment Historical Speech Review The ability to recognize and explain the elements of the communication process is the beginning of truly understanding how to prepare for and….

ENG

  Assignment Instructions This week, you will write your first essay. Please develop the ideas you began in the forum area this week into a full essay. Use the three-part….