Categories
Uncategorized

American Ignorance of War by Czeslaw Milosz’s

American Ignorance of War by Czeslaw Milosz’s

American Ignorance of War by Czeslaw Milosz’s. ‘American Ignorance of War’ is a historical overview of the life of Americans during the interwar years up to the end of the Second World War. Milosz indicates that he was once asked, while in Warsaw, whether Americans are stupid. This probably culminated mainly due to their involvement in another devastating war, appearing to have forgotten the aftermath of the previous war. This paper is a critical analysis of Czeslaw Milosz’s ‘American Ignorance of War’, giving concrete examples and a close critique of the article, including organization, target audience, and writers’ assumptions of the audience, including language, imagery, and style used.

Milosz’s article organization uses well-coordinated and distinct paragraphs with the preceding readings creating a logical flow. The essay also embraces a system of chronologically documented events to increase understandability and ease of transition sections. Besides, the paper also adopts a method of hierarchical organization in writing events to enhance the appeal and capture the audience’s attention while reading. Milosz’s essay organization also embraces the use of short paragraphs that are distinct, summarized, and detailed to capture and maintain the reader’s attention. The short sections also make it simpler for readers to comprehend quickly, at a glance, what the article discusses. The more extended areas are few within the report. Their purpose is to elaborate on topics that need more clarification. For example, when the author tries to explain why the people of the East can hardly understand Americans, he uses a long paragraph to offer more explanation and enhance the reader’s understanding. This helps minimize misconceptions about the volatile East and West spheres. Lastly, the paper embraces a brief conclusion that allows the reader to derive decisions based on how they understand the article.

The article seeks to address its issues to a targeted active audience that should take action to rectify future errors by looking at the matters discussed from different perspectives. Milosz uses several question tags in the article to get the readers thinking before proceeding with the narrative. The first paragraph, for example, begins with the question, ‘are Americans stupid?’ Another question within the article asks which world is natural according to the reader’s perspective. Questions are valuable tools that invite the audience to reason and possibly give a solemn response while reading. Milosz also targets a mature audience that can decipher issues rather than employ a shallow understanding. For example, when he uses the analogy that people think the world they are living in is natural, the author expects the mature audience to realize that ‘natural’ is used in a different context to mean the status quo of things, such as lifestyle, ways of dressing, bloodshed, and others. These, according to the author, create the natural world. In addition, the author also chooses his words wisely to enable only mature audiences to understand what the texts mean. For example, the author uses the term ‘copulate’ instead of ‘sexual intercourse to ensure that only mature readers can follow through with the discussion. In addition, the author uses several vocabulary words throughout his work to provide that only mature audiences grasp the details. Other examples include physiological, accustom, and fabricate. Moreover, the author targets governments and decision-makers who make war decisions and the ordinary people, young men and women, who engage blindly in fighting, leaving their families, societies, countries, and economies devastated. The author wants this class of audience to open their eyes wide and realize that wars only bring more problems than benefits, such as loss of lives, damage to property, lifelong miseries, and other societal ills.

Milosz assumes that readers will find answers to some rhetorical questions and open-ended phrases used in the article. For example, when the author asks, ‘are Americans foolish,’ he does not reply. Instead, he assumes that after reading the question, the reader will respond based on their view of American society before proceeding to the following sentence. Besides, the author believes that the mature target audience will understand the complexity of the words and comprehend the wordings from a deeper meaning. For example, the author says that a man in the streets walks past a boy poking his stick into a pile of smoking ruins while whispering a song about a leader who will save their nation. In this case, Milosz assumes that the reader will not take this statement at face value. Instead, they should look at it from a deeper perspective. For example, the extent of damage caused by the war (as represented by a pile of ruins) and that even a young boy recognizes that the nation needs a great leader than the current one. Milosz also assumes readers will conclude based on their understanding of the reading and take a side. The decision offered is open-ended, with no specific inclination or side-taking. It delegates the duty of concluding the reader by providing a thought.

The author has dramatically used diverse language, imagery, and style to produce a brilliant and exciting article. The language uses simple and complex wordings to capture the reader’s attention. The terminology used also requires the readers to decipher meanings by themselves. Interesting words include natural, unnatural, decree, more urgently, and residue of hope. Additionally, a phrase such as copulate is polite and minimizes hurt to the readers. Copulate is also an outdated word that returns the reader years to when the article was written. The imagery is also evident and adequately utilized to make the piece more captivating and exciting than a dull essay using merely simple words. For example, the author has used phrasal words such as; the world goes on, a man of the East, fat little man, and warmth of the beehive life. The style used is a mixture of simple and complex words and sentences in a chronological narrative that flawlessly flows from one paragraph to the other. The author has also employed questions within the essay to engage the audience in finding answers.

To conclude, the author has managed to convey his message being simple, complex, imagery wordings and illustrations in a single exciting narrative. The article is informative and seeks to enlighten Americans on the devastating long-term effects of wars, especially on the economy, family integration, and societal wellness. The author intends to reach out to war organizers and participants to realize their involvement, in whichever way, only creates more devastation than positive outcomes.

 

 

Calculate the Price

Approximately 250 words

Total price (USD) $: 10.99